Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Rutherford

Community / Domestic Violence & Abuse

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Community / Domestic Violence & Abuse

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Domestic Violence Incidents per 1,000 Population

Current Value:
10.7
Incidents per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 10.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.4.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (8.7), Rutherford has a value of 10.7 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(8.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (10.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.3).
Prior Value
(10.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions

11.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.2.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 52 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,266 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (16.3), Rutherford has a value of 11.3 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(16.3)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.4), Rutherford has a value of 11.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (11.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.3).
Prior Value
(12.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)

County: Rutherford Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

24.0%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (23.8%), Rutherford has a value of 24.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(23.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Rutherford has a value of 24.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (24.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.5%).
Prior Value
(24.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Bicyclist Deaths

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Bicyclist Deaths

0
Deaths
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (0) is less and better than the previously measured value (2).
Prior Value
(2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Pedestrian Deaths

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Pedestrian Deaths

40
Deaths
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (40) is less and better than the previously measured value (41).
Prior Value
(41)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:
22.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 22.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 22.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (27.9%), Rutherford has a value of 22.5% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(27.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Rutherford has a value of 22.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Linguistic Isolation

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Linguistic Isolation

2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 2.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.3%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 64 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 2.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,252 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (1.5%), Rutherford has a value of 2.8% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.2%), Rutherford has a value of 2.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Current Value:

County: Rutherford People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

8,822
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Social Associations

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Social Associations

6.7
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 6.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 9.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 6.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (11.0), Rutherford has a value of 6.7 which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(11.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.1), Rutherford has a value of 6.7 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (6.7) is less and worse than the previously measured value (6.9).
Prior Value
(6.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Substantiated Child Abuse Rate

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Substantiated Child Abuse Rate

1.8
Cases per 1,000 children
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 1.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.7.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (3.6), Rutherford has a value of 1.8 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(3.6)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (1.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.7).
Prior Value
(2.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.7)

County: Rutherford

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Households without a Vehicle

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Households without a Vehicle

2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 2.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 2.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (5.3%), Rutherford has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Rutherford has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Mean Travel Time to Work

28.2
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 28.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.5.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 28.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (25.5), Rutherford has a value of 28.2 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(25.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Rutherford has a value of 28.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Current Value:
42.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 42.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 50.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 42.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (36.1%), Rutherford has a value of 42.5% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(36.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Rutherford has a value of 42.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (42.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (42.7%).
Prior Value
(42.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 0.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (0.5%), Rutherford has a value of 0.3% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(0.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Rutherford has a value of 0.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

County: Rutherford Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Workers who Drive Alone to Work

76.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 76.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 82.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 84.3%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 76.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (78.8%), Rutherford has a value of 76.5% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(78.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Rutherford has a value of 76.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Employer Establishments

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Employer Establishments

5,833
Number of Establishments
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (5,833) is greater  than the previously measured value (5,631).
Prior Value
(5,631)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
65.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 65.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 50.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 65.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (57.0%), Rutherford has a value of 65.2% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(57.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Rutherford has a value of 65.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
68.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 68.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 51.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 48.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 68.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (58.4%), Rutherford has a value of 68.2% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(58.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Rutherford has a value of 68.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Size of Labor Force

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Size of Labor Force

198,883
Persons
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (198,883) is less and worse than the previously measured value (198,949).
Prior Value
(198,949)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Total Employment

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Total Employment

114,754
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (114,754) is less  than the previously measured value (117,198).
Prior Value
(117,198)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Total Employment Change

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Total Employment Change

-2.1%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of -2.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -0.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -2.8%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of -2.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -2.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -5.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (-2.0%), Rutherford has a value of -2.1% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(-2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (-4.3%), Rutherford has a value of -2.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (-2.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (2.5%).
Prior Value
(2.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
2.7%
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 2.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.5%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 2.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (3.5%), Rutherford has a value of 2.7% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.1%), Rutherford has a value of 2.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (2.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.4%).
Prior Value
(2.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Child Food Insecurity Rate

7.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (12.8%), Rutherford has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.8%), Rutherford has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (7.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.3%).
Prior Value
(12.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance

22%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 22% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 94 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 22% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,134 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (22%), Rutherford has a value of 22%.
TN Value
(22%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (25%), Rutherford has a value of 22% which is lower and better.
US Value
(25%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (22%) is less and better than the previously measured value (27%).
Prior Value
(27%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Food Insecurity Rate

8.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 8.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 8.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (11.5%), Rutherford has a value of 8.4% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Rutherford has a value of 8.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (8.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.1%).
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
61.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (50.3%), Rutherford has a value of 61.1%.
TN Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Rutherford has a value of 61.1%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

Current Value:
5,699
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
11.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (16.6%), Rutherford has a value of 11.8% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (11.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (19.9%).
Prior Value
(19.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rutherford Projected Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Projected Food Insecurity Rate

11.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (14.0%), Rutherford has a value of 11.1% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (11.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.2%).
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rutherford Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program

Current Value:
27.6%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.9%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 70 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 43.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,951 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (43.1%), Rutherford has a value of 27.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(43.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (27.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (37.6%).
Prior Value
(37.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Households with Cash Public Assistance Income

Current Value:
1.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 1.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.8%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 1.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,923 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (2.1%), Rutherford has a value of 1.8% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.7%), Rutherford has a value of 1.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Homeowner Vacancy Rate

1.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 1.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.5%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 1.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (1.1%), Rutherford has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Rutherford has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Homeownership

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Homeownership

60.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 60.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 60.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (59.6%), Rutherford has a value of 60.6% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Rutherford has a value of 60.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Housing Units

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Housing Units

139,340
Housing units
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (139,340) is greater  than the previously measured value (135,498).
Prior Value
(135,498)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Median Household Gross Rent

$1,311
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of $1,311 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $777 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $863.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value ($1,047), Rutherford has a value of $1,311 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
($1,047)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Rutherford has a value of $1,311 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Median Housing Unit Value

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Median Housing Unit Value

$305,100
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of $305,100 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $163,700 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $136,700.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value ($232,100), Rutherford has a value of $305,100 which is higher and better.
TN Value
($232,100)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Rutherford has a value of $305,100 which is higher and better.
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

$477
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of $477 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $390 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $435.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value ($442), Rutherford has a value of $477 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
($442)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Rutherford has a value of $477 which is lower and better.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Current Value:
$1,626
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of $1,626 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,173 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,325.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value ($1,449), Rutherford has a value of $1,626 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
($1,449)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Rutherford has a value of $1,626 which is lower and better.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing

22.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 22.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (25.0%), Rutherford has a value of 22.2% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Rutherford has a value of 22.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (22.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20.0%).
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

County: Rutherford Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Overcrowded Households

2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 2.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.3%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (1.9%), Rutherford has a value of 2.6% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Rutherford has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

48.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 48.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 43.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.6%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 48.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (47.9%), Rutherford has a value of 48.9% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Rutherford has a value of 48.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

County: Rutherford Severe Housing Problems

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Severe Housing Problems

12.7%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 12.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 12.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (13.3%), Rutherford has a value of 12.7% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Rutherford has a value of 12.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (12.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold

54.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 54.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 53.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (56.0%), Rutherford has a value of 54.2% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(56.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (54.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (54.8%).
Prior Value
(54.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)

37.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 37.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (30.0%), Rutherford has a value of 37.6% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(30.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (37.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (36.5%).
Prior Value
(36.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Income Inequality

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Income Inequality

0.399
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 0.399 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.447 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.466.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 0.399 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.445 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.470.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (0.476), Rutherford has a value of 0.399 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(0.476)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.483), Rutherford has a value of 0.399 which is lower and better.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Median Household Income

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Median Household Income

$78,291
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of $78,291 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $54,357 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $47,994.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of $78,291 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value ($64,035), Rutherford has a value of $78,291 which is higher and better.
TN Value
($64,035)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Rutherford has a value of $78,291 which is higher and better.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Per Capita Income

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Per Capita Income

$35,135
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of $35,135 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $28,321 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $26,545.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of $35,135 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value ($36,040), Rutherford has a value of $35,135 which is lower and worse.
TN Value
($36,040)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Rutherford has a value of $35,135 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
11.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.9%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (19.2%), Rutherford has a value of 11.1% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(19.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Rutherford has a value of 11.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (10.0%), Rutherford has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Rutherford has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Households Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
8.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (14.0%), Rutherford has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (8.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.8%).
Prior Value
(8.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
7.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (10.1%), Rutherford has a value of 7.6% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Rutherford has a value of 7.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Current Value:
2,794
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Current Value:
74.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 74.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.6%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 74.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (67.4%), Rutherford has a value of 74.3% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(67.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Rutherford has a value of 74.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
9.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (14.0%), Rutherford has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Rutherford has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

County: Rutherford Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
12.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.8%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (21.4%), Rutherford has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(21.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Rutherford has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Youth not in School or Working

1.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 1.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 1.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (2.0%), Rutherford has a value of 1.9% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Rutherford has a value of 1.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Child Care Centers

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Child Care Centers

6.6
Per 1,000 population under age 5
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 6.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 9.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.4.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (9.0), Rutherford has a value of 6.6 which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(9.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0), Rutherford has a value of 6.6 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(7.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (6.6) is less and worse than the previously measured value (7.0).
Prior Value
(7.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rutherford

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
33.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 33.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 17.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 13.3%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 33.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (29.7%), Rutherford has a value of 33.4% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(29.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Rutherford has a value of 33.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
92.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 92.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 92.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (89.3%), Rutherford has a value of 92.7% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(89.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Rutherford has a value of 92.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Education / School Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Education / School Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Student-to-Teacher Ratio

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Student-to-Teacher Ratio

15.6
Students per teacher
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 15.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.6.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 15.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (15.3), Rutherford has a value of 15.6 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(15.3)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.4), Rutherford has a value of 15.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (15.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.8).
Prior Value
(15.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Education / Student Performance K-12

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Education / Student Performance K-12

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford High School Graduation

Current Value:

County: Rutherford High School Graduation

95.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 95.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 90.6%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 93 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (89.8%), Rutherford has a value of 95.4% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(89.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (86.5%), Rutherford has a value of 95.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(86.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for Education Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (95.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (95.1%).
Prior Value
(95.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (90.7%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(90.7%)

County: Rutherford Students Proficient in English Language Arts: Grades 3-8

40.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 40.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 31.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 93 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (35.1%), Rutherford has a value of 40.8% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(35.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (40.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (34.7%).
Prior Value
(34.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Students Proficient in Math: Grades 3-8

Current Value:
44.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 44.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 31.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 25.6%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 93 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (34.9%), Rutherford has a value of 44.8% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(34.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (44.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (39.4%).
Prior Value
(39.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Environmental Health / Air

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Environmental Health / Air

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Annual Ozone Air Quality

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Annual Ozone Air Quality

2
(2010-2012)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Rutherford has a value of 2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on the average annual number of days that ozone levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2).
Prior Value
(2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air

Current Value:
44,393
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (44,393) is less and better than the previously measured value (47,534).
Prior Value
(47,534)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Access to Exercise Opportunities

Current Value:
55.2%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 55.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 49.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 35.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 94 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 55.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (67.4%), Rutherford has a value of 55.2% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(67.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Rutherford has a value of 55.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (55.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (58.5%).
Prior Value
(58.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rutherford Access to Parks

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Access to Parks

29.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 29.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 13.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.8%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (53.5%), Rutherford has a value of 29.2% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(53.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (29.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (20.7%).
Prior Value
(20.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rutherford Food Environment Index

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Food Environment Index

8.4
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 8.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 93 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 8.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (6.5), Rutherford has a value of 8.4 which is higher and better.
TN Value
(6.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Rutherford has a value of 8.4 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (8.4) is greater and better than the previously measured value (8.1).
Prior Value
(8.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Liquor Store Density

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Liquor Store Density

8.0
Stores per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 8.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 50 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 8.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,477 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (9.4), Rutherford has a value of 8.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(9.4)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.7), Rutherford has a value of 8.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (8.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.6).
Prior Value
(7.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Proximity to Highways

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Proximity to Highways

6.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 6.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (9.4%), Rutherford has a value of 6.3% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(9.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (6.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.1%).
Prior Value
(6.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rutherford

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Houses Built Prior to 1950

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Houses Built Prior to 1950

2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 2.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 2.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (9.8%), Rutherford has a value of 2.8% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Rutherford has a value of 2.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford PBT Released

Current Value:

County: Rutherford PBT Released

13,951
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (13,951) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13,438).
Prior Value
(13,438)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

3,760.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 3,760.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3,854.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4,006.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (3,869.0), Rutherford has a value of 3,760.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(3,869.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (3,760.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (4,014.0).
Prior Value
(4,014.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Number of Extreme Heat Days

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Number of Extreme Heat Days

11
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (11) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9).
Prior Value
(9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Number of Extreme Heat Events

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Number of Extreme Heat Events

8
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7).
Prior Value
(7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Number of Extreme Precipitation Days

Current Value:
33
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (33) is less and better than the previously measured value (38).
Prior Value
(38)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse

Current Value:
0
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.