Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Bedford

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Adults who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Bedford Adults who Binge Drink

16.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 16.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.6%), Bedford has a value of 16.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Adults who Drink Excessively

Current Value:
15.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 15.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 15.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (16.9%), Bedford has a value of 15.5% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Bedford has a value of 15.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (15.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.1%).
Prior Value
(15.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

30.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 30.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 45.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 30.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (34.8), Bedford has a value of 30.3 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(34.8)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Bedford has a value of 30.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (30.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.9).
Prior Value
(22.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Bedford Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Current Value:
35.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 35.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.2.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 35.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (43.2), Bedford has a value of 35.8 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(43.2)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.2), Bedford has a value of 35.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Bedford Inpatient Stays due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

29.0
Age-Adjusted Rate per 100,000
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (20.0), Bedford has a value of 29.0 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(20.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (29.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (17.0).
Prior Value
(17.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Outpatient Visits due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

82.0
Age-Adjusted Rate per 100,000
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 82.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 82.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 106.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 70 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (91.0), Bedford has a value of 82.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(91.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (82.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (55.0).
Prior Value
(55.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Outpatient Visits involving Heroin

Current Value:
27.0
Age-Adjusted Rate per 100,000
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 27.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 57.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 100.0.
TN Counties
(2021)
The distribution is based on data from 59 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (35.0), Bedford has a value of 27.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (27.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (31.0).
Prior Value
(31.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

County: Bedford Adults with Cancer

7.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 7.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 7.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Bedford has a value of 7.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Adults with Cancer (Non-Skin) or Melanoma

Current Value:
8.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 8.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 8.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (8.2%), Bedford has a value of 8.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer

Current Value:
26.8
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 26.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.7.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 26.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,778 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (21.7), Bedford has a value of 26.8 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(21.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.3), Bedford has a value of 26.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (26.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.2).
Prior Value
(20.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Current Value:
184.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 184.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 186.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 195.7.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 184.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 162.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 179.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,080 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (166.3), Bedford has a value of 184.3 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(166.3)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (146.0), Bedford has a value of 184.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(146.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (184.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (196.6).
Prior Value
(196.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

Current Value:
54.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 54.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 94 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 54.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 48.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,746 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (44.1), Bedford has a value of 54.3 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(44.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.4), Bedford has a value of 54.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (54.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (57.4).
Prior Value
(57.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer

Current Value:
28.7
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 28.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,612 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (19.6), Bedford has a value of 28.7 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0), Bedford has a value of 28.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (28.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (28.2).
Prior Value
(28.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)

County: Bedford All Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Bedford All Cancer Incidence Rate

457.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 457.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 468.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 486.5.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 457.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 459.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 492.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,931 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (457.3), Bedford has a value of 457.5 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(457.3)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (444.4), Bedford has a value of 457.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(444.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (457.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (446.0).
Prior Value
(446.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
104.2
Cases per 100,000 females
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 104.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 121.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 130.3.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 104.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 125.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 137.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,712 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (124.6), Bedford has a value of 104.2 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(124.6)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (129.8), Bedford has a value of 104.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(129.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (104.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (107.4).
Prior Value
(107.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Bedford Cancer: Medicare Population

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (11.0%), Bedford has a value of 11.0%.
TN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Bedford has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
14.6
Cases per 100,000 females
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 14.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 744 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (8.5), Bedford has a value of 14.6 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(8.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Bedford has a value of 14.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (14.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.8).
Prior Value
(14.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Bedford Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:
81.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 81.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 81.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Bedford has a value of 81.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Colon Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Bedford Colon Cancer Screening

63.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 63.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 63.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), Bedford has a value of 63.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
61.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 61.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 61.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 61.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (66.3%), Bedford has a value of 61.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
38.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 38.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 45.8.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 93 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 38.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,613 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (38.7), Bedford has a value of 38.4 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(38.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4), Bedford has a value of 38.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (38.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.7).
Prior Value
(39.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
76.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 76.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 77.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 87.4.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 76.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 62.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 73.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,711 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (68.1), Bedford has a value of 76.4 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(68.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (53.1), Bedford has a value of 76.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(53.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (76.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (76.7).
Prior Value
(76.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:
68.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 68.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 68.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (76.5%), Bedford has a value of 68.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(76.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

County: Bedford Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
45.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 45.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 45.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (45.0%), Bedford has a value of 45.0%.
TN Value
(45.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Bedford has a value of 45.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (45.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (46.0%).
Prior Value
(46.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
129.7
Cases per 100,000 males
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 129.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 103.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 122.5.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 129.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 110.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 127.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,728 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (115.1), Bedford has a value of 129.7 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(115.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (113.2), Bedford has a value of 129.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(113.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (129.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (116.0).
Prior Value
(116.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford

Health / Children's Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Children's Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Child Mortality Rate: Under 20

Current Value:
78.0
Deaths per 100,000 population under 20
(2018-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 78.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 64.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.8.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 74 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 78.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,859 U.S. counties and county equivalents. Counties in Idaho, Kentucky, and Oklahoma are excluded due to incomparable data between each other and the rest of the country.
Compared to the TN Value (65.1), Bedford has a value of 78.0 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(65.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.6), Bedford has a value of 78.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(50.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford

Health / County Health Rankings

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / County Health Rankings

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Clinical Care Ranking

Current Value:

County: Bedford Clinical Care Ranking

66
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 66 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.

County: Bedford Health Behaviors Ranking

Current Value:

County: Bedford Health Behaviors Ranking

38
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 38 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.

County: Bedford Morbidity Ranking

Current Value:

County: Bedford Morbidity Ranking

35
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 35 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.

County: Bedford Mortality Ranking

Current Value:

County: Bedford Mortality Ranking

46
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 46 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.

County: Bedford Physical Environment Ranking

Current Value:
32
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 32 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.

County: Bedford Social and Economic Factors Ranking

Current Value:
33
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 33 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.

County: Bedford

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Adults 20+ with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Bedford Adults 20+ with Diabetes

8.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.6%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (8.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.8%).
Prior Value
(8.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:
35.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 35.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 51.6.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (31.2), Bedford has a value of 35.9 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(31.2)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Bedford has a value of 35.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (35.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.2).
Prior Value
(21.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Bedford Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:
27.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 27.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (26.0%), Bedford has a value of 27.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(26.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Bedford has a value of 27.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (27.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.0%).
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
16.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 16.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 16.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (26.9%), Bedford has a value of 16.8% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(26.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Bedford has a value of 16.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Children with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Bedford Children with a Disability

3.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (5.1%), Bedford has a value of 3.3%.
TN Value
(5.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Bedford has a value of 3.3%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
5.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (6.4%), Bedford has a value of 5.6%.
TN Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Bedford has a value of 5.6%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Bedford Persons with a Disability

15.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (15.3%), Bedford has a value of 15.4%.
TN Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Bedford has a value of 15.4%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (4.3%), Bedford has a value of 4.2%.
TN Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Bedford has a value of 4.2%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
1.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (2.9%), Bedford has a value of 1.9%.
TN Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Bedford has a value of 1.9%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (3.1%), Bedford has a value of 2.0%.
TN Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Bedford has a value of 2.0%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
8.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (8.3%), Bedford has a value of 8.5%.
TN Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Bedford has a value of 8.5%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Veterans with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Bedford Veterans with a Disability

38.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (32.4%), Bedford has a value of 38.2%.
TN Value
(32.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (29.8%), Bedford has a value of 38.2%.
US Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Teen Birth Rate: 15-17

Current Value:

County: Bedford Teen Birth Rate: 15-17

11.6
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-17
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 11.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (13.0), Bedford has a value of 11.6 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(13.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (11.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.6).
Prior Value
(11.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
75.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 75.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 77.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.3%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 75.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 77.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (76.1%), Bedford has a value of 75.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(76.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:
12.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 12.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.5%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 12.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Bedford has a value of 12.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Medicare Healthcare Costs

Current Value:

County: Bedford Medicare Healthcare Costs

$10,526
Dollars per enrollee
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value ($10,071), Bedford has a value of $10,526.
TN Value
($10,071)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value ($9,729), Bedford has a value of $10,526.
US Value
($9,729)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford ($10,526) is greater  than the previously measured value ($9,732).
Prior Value
($9,732)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
104
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 104 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 110 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 104 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (176), Bedford has a value of 104 which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(176)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (104) is greater and better than the previously measured value (82).
Prior Value
(82)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
87.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 87.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 87.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (88.9%), Bedford has a value of 87.1% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(88.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (87.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (85.3%).
Prior Value
(85.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Bedford Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Current Value:
2,746
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 2,746 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,890 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,301.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 2,746 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,375.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (2,841), Bedford has a value of 2,746 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(2,841)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677), Bedford has a value of 2,746 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (2,746) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2,436).
Prior Value
(2,436)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:

County: Bedford Primary Care Provider Rate

29
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 29 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 25.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 89 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 29 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 29.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (70), Bedford has a value of 29 which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(70)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (29) is less and worse than the previously measured value (30).
Prior Value
(30)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
83.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 83.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 77.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 83.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (85.9%), Bedford has a value of 83.5% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(85.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Bedford has a value of 83.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

89.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 89.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 89.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (92.3%), Bedford has a value of 89.5% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(92.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Bedford has a value of 89.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
84.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 84.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 84.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (88.9%), Bedford has a value of 84.3% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(88.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Bedford has a value of 84.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:
3.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 3.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 3.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Bedford has a value of 3.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
7.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 7.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 7.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Bedford has a value of 7.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

79.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 79.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.8%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 79.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 77.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,066 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Bedford has a value of 79.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

31.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 31.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 49.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.4.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 78 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (46.4), Bedford has a value of 31.4 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(46.4)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (38.8), Bedford has a value of 31.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (31.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (48.4).
Prior Value
(48.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

185.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 185.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 137.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 169.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 185.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 98.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 121.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (120.9), Bedford has a value of 185.5 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(120.9)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (90.2), Bedford has a value of 185.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (185.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (175.9).
Prior Value
(175.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (71.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Current Value:
121.5
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 121.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 83.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 124.4.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 121.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 61.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 87.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,101 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (86.4), Bedford has a value of 121.5 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(86.4)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (121.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (121.2).
Prior Value
(121.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease

Current Value:
305.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 305.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 245.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 278.8.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (218.3), Bedford has a value of 305.3 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(218.3)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (305.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (260.7).
Prior Value
(260.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack

34.7
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 34.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.5.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (31.7), Bedford has a value of 34.7 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(31.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (34.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (37.7).
Prior Value
(37.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (14.0%), Bedford has a value of 14.0%.
TN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Bedford has a value of 14.0%.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (14.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:

County: Bedford Cholesterol Test History

85.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 85.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 85.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,066 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Bedford has a value of 85.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (11.0%), Bedford has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Bedford has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:
37.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 37.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.8%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 37.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,066 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), Bedford has a value of 37.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

County: Bedford High Cholesterol Prevalence

Current Value:

County: Bedford High Cholesterol Prevalence

36.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 36.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 36.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,066 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (35.5%), Bedford has a value of 36.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:
33.5%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 33.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.5%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 33.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Bedford has a value of 33.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
68.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 68.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 65.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 68.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (65.0%), Bedford has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Bedford has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (68.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (68.0%).
Prior Value
(68.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
73.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 73.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 71.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 73.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 73.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (69.0%), Bedford has a value of 73.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Bedford has a value of 73.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (73.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (73.0%).
Prior Value
(73.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
22.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 22.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 22.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (22.0%), Bedford has a value of 22.0%.
TN Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Bedford has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (22.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Bedford Stroke: Medicare Population

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (6.0%), Bedford has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Bedford has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

18.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 18.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 60 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 18.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,449 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (18.5), Bedford has a value of 18.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(18.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Bedford has a value of 18.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (18.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.4).
Prior Value
(17.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

Current Value:
0.0
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.9.
TN Counties
(Jan 13, 2023)
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (1.2), Bedford has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(1.2)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.7), Bedford has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

Current Value:
9.37
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 9.37 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.80 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.28.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 9.37 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.84 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.01.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (11.69), Bedford has a value of 9.37 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(11.69)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.97), Bedford has a value of 9.37 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (9.37) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.50).
Prior Value
(13.50)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
48.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 48.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 46.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 42.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 48.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (51.0%), Bedford has a value of 48.0% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(51.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Bedford has a value of 48.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (48.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (47.0%).
Prior Value
(47.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19

Current Value:
44.8%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 44.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 44.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.8%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 44.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (44.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.8%).
Prior Value
(44.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (8.0%), Bedford has a value of 6.0% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Bedford has a value of 6.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (6.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Tuberculosis Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Bedford Tuberculosis Incidence Rate

2.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (1.7), Bedford has a value of 2.0 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.5), Bedford has a value of 2.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.5 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (2.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.0).
Prior Value
(2.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (1.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(1.4)

County: Bedford

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Babies with Low Birthweight

Current Value:

County: Bedford Babies with Low Birthweight

9.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 9.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.6%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 79 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (9.0%), Bedford has a value of 9.6% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.6%), Bedford has a value of 9.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (9.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.6%).
Prior Value
(10.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Babies with Very Low Birthweight

Current Value:
1.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 1.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (1.6%), Bedford has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(1.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.4%), Bedford has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (1.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.2%).
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

County: Bedford Infant Mortality Rate

9.1
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2015-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (6.9), Bedford has a value of 9.1 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(6.9)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (9.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0).
Prior Value
(9.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Bedford Preterm Births

Current Value:

County: Bedford Preterm Births

13.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 13.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.6%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 87 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (11.3%), Bedford has a value of 13.1% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (13.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.7%).
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)

County: Bedford

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:
30.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 30.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 30.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (20.7%), Bedford has a value of 30.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(20.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Current Value:
17.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 17.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.7.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 49 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 17.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,307 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (17.0), Bedford has a value of 17.6 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(17.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Bedford has a value of 17.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (17.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.2).
Prior Value
(15.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Bedford Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (18.0%), Bedford has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Bedford has a value of 16.0%.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (16.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Frequent Mental Distress

Current Value:

County: Bedford Frequent Mental Distress

18.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 18.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 18.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (16.3%), Bedford has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Bedford has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (18.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.0%).
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Bedford Mental Health Provider Rate

Current Value:

County: Bedford Mental Health Provider Rate

75
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 75 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 35.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 91 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 75 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 137 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (188), Bedford has a value of 75 which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(188)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (75) is greater and better than the previously measured value (72).
Prior Value
(72)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
21.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 21.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 21.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (15.8%), Bedford has a value of 21.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days

Current Value:
6.0
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 6.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.3.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 6.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (5.8), Bedford has a value of 6.0 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(5.8)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.8), Bedford has a value of 6.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (6.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.2).
Prior Value
(5.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Life Expectancy

Current Value:

County: Bedford Life Expectancy

73.1
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 73.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.8.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 73.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (74.1), Bedford has a value of 73.1 which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(74.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (77.6), Bedford has a value of 73.1 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Premature Death

Current Value:

County: Bedford Premature Death

11,553.7
Years per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 11,553.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11,968.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13,396.7.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 11,553.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9,469.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11,769.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,886 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (11,043.4), Bedford has a value of 11,553.7 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(11,043.4)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (7,971.5), Bedford has a value of 11,553.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7,971.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

37.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 37.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 34.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 37.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Bedford has a value of 37.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

38.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 38.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 39.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 37.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 38.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Bedford has a value of 38.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:
42.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (37.3%), Bedford has a value of 42.1%.
TN Value
(37.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Bedford has a value of 42.1%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
16.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (15.8%), Bedford has a value of 16.4%.
TN Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Bedford has a value of 16.4%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
5.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (7.7%), Bedford has a value of 5.1%.
TN Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Bedford has a value of 5.1%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
6.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (7.3%), Bedford has a value of 6.4%.
TN Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Bedford has a value of 6.4%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
13.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (14.8%), Bedford has a value of 13.1%.
TN Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Bedford has a value of 13.1%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease

38.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 38.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 53.8.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 62 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (36.0), Bedford has a value of 38.5 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(36.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (38.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (33.4).
Prior Value
(33.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Bedford Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
(2021)
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (7.0%), Bedford has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Bedford has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (6.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 17.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (12.2%), Bedford has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:
55.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 55.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.5%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 55.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (63.9%), Bedford has a value of 55.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(63.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Dentist Rate

Current Value:

County: Bedford Dentist Rate

25
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 25 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 32 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 23.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 25 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (56), Bedford has a value of 25 which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(56)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (25) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25).
Prior Value
(25)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

County: Bedford Adults with Arthritis

32.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 32.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 32.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (26.6%), Bedford has a value of 32.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:

County: Bedford Adults with Kidney Disease

3.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 3.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 3.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Bedford has a value of 3.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
22.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 22.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 22.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (19.0%), Bedford has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Bedford has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (22.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (10.0%), Bedford has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Bedford has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (11.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

35.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 35.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 35.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (37.0%), Bedford has a value of 35.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(37.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Bedford has a value of 35.0%.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (35.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.0%).
Prior Value
(35.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

Current Value:
18.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 18.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.3%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 18.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (18.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.9%).
Prior Value
(22.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms

Current Value:
13.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 13.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,080 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (17.5), Bedford has a value of 13.4 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(17.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.5), Bedford has a value of 13.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (13.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.4).
Prior Value
(14.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)

County: Bedford Death Rate due to Injuries

Current Value:

County: Bedford Death Rate due to Injuries

95.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 95.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 111.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 127.8.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 95.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 93.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 111.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,037 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (108.1), Bedford has a value of 95.1 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(108.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (80.0), Bedford has a value of 95.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(80.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Adults with COPD

Current Value:

County: Bedford Adults with COPD

9.9%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 9.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Bedford has a value of 9.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:

County: Bedford Adults with Current Asthma

11.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 11.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.9%), Bedford has a value of 11.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases

56.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 56.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 73.2.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (47.0), Bedford has a value of 56.3 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(47.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (56.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (63.1).
Prior Value
(63.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Bedford Asthma: Medicare Population

4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 4.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 4.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (6.0%), Bedford has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Bedford has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (4.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Bedford COPD: Medicare Population

14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 14.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (13.0%), Bedford has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Bedford has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (14.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Bedford Chlamydia Incidence Rate

475.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 475.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 291.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 410.8.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 475.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 294.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 467.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (538.1), Bedford has a value of 475.5 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(538.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (495.0), Bedford has a value of 475.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (475.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (457.8).
Prior Value
(457.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Bedford Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

206.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 206.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 95.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 162.7.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 206.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 169.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (227.9), Bedford has a value of 206.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(227.9)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (194.4), Bedford has a value of 206.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(194.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (206.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (236.7).
Prior Value
(236.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford HIV Prevalence Rate

Current Value:

County: Bedford HIV Prevalence Rate

158.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (324.2), Bedford has a value of 158.2.
TN Value
(324.2)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (386.6), Bedford has a value of 158.2.
US Value
(386.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (158.2) is greater  than the previously measured value (154.4).
Prior Value
(154.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Syphilis Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Bedford Syphilis Incidence Rate

15.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 15.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.6.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (16.0), Bedford has a value of 15.4 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(16.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.7), Bedford has a value of 15.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(17.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (15.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.8).
Prior Value
(9.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Syphilis Incidence Rate: Early Latent

Current Value:
0.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (12.6), Bedford has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(12.6)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.1), Bedford has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(17.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.0).
Prior Value
(2.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

County: Bedford Adults who Smoke

21.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 21.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 21.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Bedford has a value of 21.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Bedford

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Bedford Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

23.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 23.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 23.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (23.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.3%).
Prior Value
(27.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)

County: Bedford

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Frequent Physical Distress

Current Value:

County: Bedford Frequent Physical Distress

16.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 16.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 16.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (14.2%), Bedford has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Bedford has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (16.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.5%).
Prior Value
(16.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Bedford Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

County: Bedford Insufficient Sleep

40.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 40.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.9%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 40.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (36.0%), Bedford has a value of 40.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

County: Bedford Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
15.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 15.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (12.7%), Bedford has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Poor Physical Health: Average Number of Days

Current Value:
4.4
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 4.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 4.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (4.1), Bedford has a value of 4.4 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(4.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.3), Bedford has a value of 4.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (4.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.8).
Prior Value
(3.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

22.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 22.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.5%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 22.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (17.9%), Bedford has a value of 22.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Voter Turnout: Presidential Election

Current Value:
70.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 70.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (69.3%), Bedford has a value of 70.8% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (70.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (62.2%).
Prior Value
(62.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (58.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(58.4%)
<div>SDOH-07: Increase the proportion of the voting-age citizens who vote</div>

County: Bedford

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Violent Crime Rate

Current Value:

County: Bedford Violent Crime Rate

445.4
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 445.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 329.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 435.8.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (617.5), Bedford has a value of 445.4 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(617.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (445.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (486.9).
Prior Value
(486.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Average Household Size

Current Value:

County: Bedford Average Household Size

2.70
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (2.50), Bedford has a value of 2.70.
TN Value
(2.50)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Bedford has a value of 2.70.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Female Population

Current Value:

County: Bedford Female Population

50.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (51.0%), Bedford has a value of 50.1%.
TN Value
(51.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.5%), Bedford has a value of 50.1%.
US Value
(50.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (50.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (50.2%).
Prior Value
(50.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

County: Bedford Foreign Born Persons

6.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (5.4%), Bedford has a value of 6.4%.
TN Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Bedford has a value of 6.4%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Households

Current Value:

County: Bedford Households

18,469
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Male Population

Current Value:

County: Bedford Male Population

49.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (49.0%), Bedford has a value of 49.9%.
TN Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.5%), Bedford has a value of 49.9%.
US Value
(49.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (49.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (49.8%).
Prior Value
(49.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Population Age 5+ with Language Other than English Spoken at Home

11.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (7.6%), Bedford has a value of 11.6%.
TN Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Bedford has a value of 11.6%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Bedford Population American Indian and Alaska Native

Current Value:
1.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (0.6%), Bedford has a value of 1.5%.
TN Value
(0.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Bedford has a value of 1.5%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (1.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.5%).
Prior Value
(1.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Population Asian

Current Value:

County: Bedford Population Asian

1.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (2.1%), Bedford has a value of 1.2%.
TN Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Bedford has a value of 1.2%.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (1.2%) is greater  than the previously measured value (1.1%).
Prior Value
(1.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Population Black or African American

Current Value:
8.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (16.5%), Bedford has a value of 8.7%.
TN Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Bedford has a value of 8.7%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (8.7%) is less  than the previously measured value (8.8%).
Prior Value
(8.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Population Hispanic or Latino

Current Value:
16.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (7.5%), Bedford has a value of 16.3%.
TN Value
(7.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Bedford has a value of 16.3%.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (16.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (15.8%).
Prior Value
(15.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander

0.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (0.1%), Bedford has a value of 0.2%.
TN Value
(0.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.3%), Bedford has a value of 0.2%.
US Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (0.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.2%).
Prior Value
(0.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Population Over Age 65

Current Value:

County: Bedford Population Over Age 65

15.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (17.4%), Bedford has a value of 15.1%.
TN Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.7%), Bedford has a value of 15.1%.
US Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (15.1%) is greater  than the previously measured value (14.8%).
Prior Value
(14.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Current Value:
7,356
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Population Two or More Races

Current Value:
2.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (2.3%), Bedford has a value of 2.4%.
TN Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Bedford has a value of 2.4%.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (2.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.4%).
Prior Value
(2.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Population Under Age 18

Current Value:

County: Bedford Population Under Age 18

25.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (22.0%), Bedford has a value of 25.2%.
TN Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Bedford has a value of 25.2%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (25.2%) is less  than the previously measured value (25.3%).
Prior Value
(25.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Population Under Age 5

Current Value:

County: Bedford Population Under Age 5

6.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (5.8%), Bedford has a value of 6.7%.
TN Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.5%), Bedford has a value of 6.7%.
US Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (6.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.7%).
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Population White

Current Value:

County: Bedford Population White

86.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (78.4%), Bedford has a value of 86.0%.
TN Value
(78.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (75.3%), Bedford has a value of 86.0%.
US Value
(75.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (86.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (86.1%).
Prior Value
(86.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Bedford Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)

Current Value:
72.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (72.0%), Bedford has a value of 72.6%.
TN Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.4%), Bedford has a value of 72.6%.
US Value
(58.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (72.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (73.1%).
Prior Value
(73.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.