Search for Indicators

Disparities Dashboard

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Bedford

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Current Value:
196.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 196.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 183.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 197.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 196.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 162.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 179.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (170.4), Bedford has a value of 196.6 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(170.4)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (149.4), Bedford has a value of 196.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (196.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (198.2).
Prior Value
(198.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

Current Value:
57.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 57.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.1.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 57.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 50.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (47.0), Bedford has a value of 57.4 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(47.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0), Bedford has a value of 57.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (57.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (54.1).
Prior Value
(54.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford All Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Bedford All Cancer Incidence Rate

446.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 446.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 465.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 484.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 446.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 455.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 485.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (457.7), Bedford has a value of 446.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(457.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (442.3), Bedford has a value of 446.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (446.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (458.3).
Prior Value
(458.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Bedford Cancer: Medicare Population

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (11.0%), Bedford has a value of 11.0%.
TN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Bedford has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
39.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 39.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 45.9.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 94 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 39.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (39.2), Bedford has a value of 39.7 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(39.2)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Bedford has a value of 39.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (39.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.2).
Prior Value
(39.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
76.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 76.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 78.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 88.2.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 76.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (69.7), Bedford has a value of 76.7 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(69.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Bedford has a value of 76.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (76.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (75.7).
Prior Value
(75.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
45.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 45.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 45.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (45.0%), Bedford has a value of 45.0%.
TN Value
(45.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Bedford has a value of 45.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (45.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (46.0%).
Prior Value
(46.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Adults 20+ with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Bedford Adults 20+ with Diabetes

8.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.6%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (8.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.8%).
Prior Value
(8.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:
27.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 27.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (26.0%), Bedford has a value of 27.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(26.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Bedford has a value of 27.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (27.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.0%).
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Children with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Bedford Children with a Disability

3.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (5.1%), Bedford has a value of 3.3%.
TN Value
(5.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Bedford has a value of 3.3%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
5.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (6.4%), Bedford has a value of 5.6%.
TN Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Bedford has a value of 5.6%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Bedford Persons with a Disability

15.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (15.3%), Bedford has a value of 15.4%.
TN Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Bedford has a value of 15.4%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (4.3%), Bedford has a value of 4.2%.
TN Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Bedford has a value of 4.2%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
1.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (2.9%), Bedford has a value of 1.9%.
TN Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Bedford has a value of 1.9%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (3.1%), Bedford has a value of 2.0%.
TN Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Bedford has a value of 2.0%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
8.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (8.3%), Bedford has a value of 8.5%.
TN Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Bedford has a value of 8.5%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
85.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 85.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 85.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (88.1%), Bedford has a value of 85.3% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(88.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (85.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (84.4%).
Prior Value
(84.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Current Value:
2,746.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 2,746.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,890.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,301.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 2,746.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (2,841.0), Bedford has a value of 2,746.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(2,841.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Bedford has a value of 2,746.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (2,746.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2,436.0).
Prior Value
(2,436.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
84.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 84.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 84.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (88.9%), Bedford has a value of 84.3% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(88.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Bedford has a value of 84.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

185.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 185.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 137.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 169.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 185.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 98.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 121.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (120.9), Bedford has a value of 185.5 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(120.9)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (90.2), Bedford has a value of 185.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (185.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (175.9).
Prior Value
(175.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (71.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Current Value:
121.2
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 121.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 128.7.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 80 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (83.1), Bedford has a value of 121.2 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(83.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (121.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (108.9).
Prior Value
(108.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease

Current Value:
260.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 260.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 237.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 268.9.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (212.0), Bedford has a value of 260.7 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(212.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (92.9), Bedford has a value of 260.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(92.9 in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (260.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (265.2).
Prior Value
(265.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (14.0%), Bedford has a value of 14.0%.
TN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Bedford has a value of 14.0%.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (14.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (11.0%), Bedford has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Bedford has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
68.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 68.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 65.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 68.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (65.0%), Bedford has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Bedford has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (68.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (68.0%).
Prior Value
(68.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
73.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 73.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 71.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 73.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 73.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (69.0%), Bedford has a value of 73.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Bedford has a value of 73.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (73.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (73.0%).
Prior Value
(73.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
22.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 22.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 22.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (22.0%), Bedford has a value of 22.0%.
TN Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Bedford has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (22.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Bedford Stroke: Medicare Population

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (6.0%), Bedford has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Bedford has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
48.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 48.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 46.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 42.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 48.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (51.0%), Bedford has a value of 48.0% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(51.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Bedford has a value of 48.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (48.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (47.0%).
Prior Value
(47.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19

Current Value:
44.8%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 44.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 44.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.8%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 44.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (44.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.8%).
Prior Value
(44.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (8.0%), Bedford has a value of 6.0% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Bedford has a value of 6.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (6.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Babies with Very Low Birthweight

Current Value:
1.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 1.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (1.6%), Bedford has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(1.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.4%), Bedford has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (1.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.2%).
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (18.0%), Bedford has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Bedford has a value of 16.0%.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (16.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Life Expectancy

Current Value:

County: Bedford Life Expectancy

73.1
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 73.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.8.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 73.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (74.1), Bedford has a value of 73.1 which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(74.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (77.6), Bedford has a value of 73.1 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:
42.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (37.3%), Bedford has a value of 42.1%.
TN Value
(37.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Bedford has a value of 42.1%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
16.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (15.8%), Bedford has a value of 16.4%.
TN Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Bedford has a value of 16.4%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
5.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (7.7%), Bedford has a value of 5.1%.
TN Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Bedford has a value of 5.1%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
6.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (7.3%), Bedford has a value of 6.4%.
TN Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Bedford has a value of 6.4%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
13.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (14.8%), Bedford has a value of 13.1%.
TN Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Bedford has a value of 13.1%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (7.0%), Bedford has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Bedford has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (6.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
22.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 22.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 22.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (19.0%), Bedford has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Bedford has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (22.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (10.0%), Bedford has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Bedford has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (11.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

35.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 35.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 35.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (37.0%), Bedford has a value of 35.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(37.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Bedford has a value of 35.0%.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (35.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.0%).
Prior Value
(35.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

Current Value:
18.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 18.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.3%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 18.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (18.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.9%).
Prior Value
(22.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

74.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 74.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 88.9.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 90 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 74.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 72.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (72.7), Bedford has a value of 74.3 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(72.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (51.6), Bedford has a value of 74.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (74.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (62.5).
Prior Value
(62.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases

63.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 63.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 60.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (51.3), Bedford has a value of 63.1 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(51.3)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (63.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (67.0).
Prior Value
(67.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Bedford Asthma: Medicare Population

4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 4.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 4.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (6.0%), Bedford has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Bedford has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (4.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Bedford COPD: Medicare Population

14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 14.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (13.0%), Bedford has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Bedford has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (14.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Bedford Chlamydia Incidence Rate

457.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 457.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 316.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 429.3.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 457.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 295.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 468.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,800 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (562.4), Bedford has a value of 457.8 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(562.4)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (495.5), Bedford has a value of 457.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(495.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (457.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (470.7).
Prior Value
(470.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Bedford Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

236.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 236.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 130.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 216.6.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 236.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 97.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 199.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,117 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (269.1), Bedford has a value of 236.7 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(269.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (214.0), Bedford has a value of 236.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(214.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (236.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (179.0).
Prior Value
(179.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Syphilis Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Bedford Syphilis Incidence Rate

9.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 9.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (13.6), Bedford has a value of 9.8 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(13.6)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.2), Bedford has a value of 9.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (9.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.0).
Prior Value
(6.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Bedford Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

23.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 23.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 23.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (23.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.3%).
Prior Value
(27.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Total Population

Current Value:

County: Bedford Total Population

51,950
People
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (51,950) is greater  than the previously measured value (51,157).
Prior Value
(51,157)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Veteran Population

Current Value:

County: Bedford Veteran Population

7.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (7.7%), Bedford has a value of 7.5%.
TN Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Bedford has a value of 7.5%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Community / Domestic Violence & Abuse

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Community / Domestic Violence & Abuse

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Domestic Violence Incidents per 1,000 Population

Current Value:
4.3
Incidents per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 4.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.4.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (8.7), Bedford has a value of 4.3 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(8.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (4.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.4).
Prior Value
(5.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Households without a Vehicle

Current Value:
3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 3.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 3.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (5.3%), Bedford has a value of 3.9% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Bedford has a value of 3.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

County: Bedford Mean Travel Time to Work

26.4
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 26.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.5.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 26.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (25.5), Bedford has a value of 26.4 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(25.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Bedford has a value of 26.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
0.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 0.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (0.5%), Bedford has a value of 0.1% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(0.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Bedford has a value of 0.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:
75.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 75.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 82.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 84.3%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 75.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (78.8%), Bedford has a value of 75.7% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(78.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Bedford has a value of 75.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

County: Bedford Overcrowded Households

3.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 3.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.3%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (1.9%), Bedford has a value of 3.2% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Bedford has a value of 3.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

45.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 45.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 43.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.6%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 45.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (47.9%), Bedford has a value of 45.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Bedford has a value of 45.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Median Household Income

Current Value:

County: Bedford Median Household Income

$59,955
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of $59,955 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $54,357 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $47,994.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of $59,955 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value ($64,035), Bedford has a value of $59,955 which is lower and worse.
TN Value
($64,035)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Bedford has a value of $59,955 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Per Capita Income

Current Value:

County: Bedford Per Capita Income

$28,520
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of $28,520 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $28,321 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $26,545.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of $28,520 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value ($36,040), Bedford has a value of $28,520 which is lower and worse.
TN Value
($36,040)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Bedford has a value of $28,520 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
21.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 21.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.9%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 21.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (19.2%), Bedford has a value of 21.2% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(19.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Bedford has a value of 21.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
11.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 11.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (10.0%), Bedford has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Bedford has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (10.1%), Bedford has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Bedford has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Current Value:
397
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
12.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (14.0%), Bedford has a value of 12.4% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Bedford has a value of 12.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
14.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 14.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.8%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 14.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (21.4%), Bedford has a value of 14.4% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(21.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Bedford has a value of 14.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:
0.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 0.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 0.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (2.0%), Bedford has a value of 0.6% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Bedford has a value of 0.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
17.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 17.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 17.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 13.3%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 17.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (29.7%), Bedford has a value of 17.1% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(29.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Bedford has a value of 17.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
85.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 85.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bedford has a value of 85.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (89.3%), Bedford has a value of 85.0% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(89.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Bedford has a value of 85.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Education / Student Performance K-12

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Education / Student Performance K-12

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford High School Graduation

Current Value:

County: Bedford High School Graduation

89.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 89.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 90.6%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 93 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (89.8%), Bedford has a value of 89.9% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(89.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (86.5%), Bedford has a value of 89.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(86.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for Education Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (89.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (91.1%).
Prior Value
(91.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Bedford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (90.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(90.7%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Bedford

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Bedford Access to Parks

Current Value:

County: Bedford Access to Parks

5.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Bedford has a value of 5.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 13.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.8%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (53.5%), Bedford has a value of 5.0% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(53.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Bedford (5.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (1.9%).
Prior Value
(1.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV