Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Rutherford

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Adults who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Adults who Binge Drink

15.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 15.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 15.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Rutherford has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

30.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 30.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 45.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 30.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (34.8), Rutherford has a value of 30.6 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(34.8)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Rutherford has a value of 30.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (30.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.4).
Prior Value
(26.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rutherford Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Current Value:
31.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 31.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.1.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 81 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 31.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,797 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (33.9), Rutherford has a value of 31.2 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(33.9)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.0), Rutherford has a value of 31.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (31.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.6).
Prior Value
(25.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Rutherford Inpatient Stays due to Heroin Overdose

Current Value:
7.0
Age-Adjusted Rate per 100,000
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (8.0), Rutherford has a value of 7.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(8.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (7.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.0).
Prior Value
(10.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Inpatient Stays due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

13.0
Age-Adjusted Rate per 100,000
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (20.0), Rutherford has a value of 13.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(20.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (13.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (20.0).
Prior Value
(20.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Outpatient Visits due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

94.0
Age-Adjusted Rate per 100,000
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 94.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 80.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 100.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 71 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (83.0), Rutherford has a value of 94.0 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(83.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (94.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (78.0).
Prior Value
(78.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Outpatient Visits involving Heroin

Current Value:
57.0
Age-Adjusted Rate per 100,000
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 57.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 57.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 100.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 59 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (54.0), Rutherford has a value of 57.0 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (57.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (80.0).
Prior Value
(80.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Adults with Cancer

5.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 5.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 5.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Rutherford has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer

Current Value:
20.9
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 20.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.8.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 69 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 20.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,755 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (21.6), Rutherford has a value of 20.9 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(21.6)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.6), Rutherford has a value of 20.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (20.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.5).
Prior Value
(20.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Current Value:
163.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 163.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 183.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 197.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 163.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 162.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 179.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (170.4), Rutherford has a value of 163.1 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(170.4)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (149.4), Rutherford has a value of 163.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (163.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (162.7).
Prior Value
(162.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

Current Value:
43.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 43.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.1.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 43.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 50.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (47.0), Rutherford has a value of 43.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(47.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0), Rutherford has a value of 43.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (43.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (45.0).
Prior Value
(45.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer

Current Value:
22.9
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 22.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,576 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (19.5), Rutherford has a value of 22.9 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(19.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), Rutherford has a value of 22.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (22.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.4).
Prior Value
(20.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)

County: Rutherford All Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Rutherford All Cancer Incidence Rate

448.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 448.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 465.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 484.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 448.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 455.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 485.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (457.7), Rutherford has a value of 448.4 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(457.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (442.3), Rutherford has a value of 448.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (448.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (456.8).
Prior Value
(456.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

126.1
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 126.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 118.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 129.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 94 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 126.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 122.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 133.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (122.4), Rutherford has a value of 126.1 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(122.4)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (127.0), Rutherford has a value of 126.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (126.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (127.6).
Prior Value
(127.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Cancer: Medicare Population

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (11.0%), Rutherford has a value of 11.0%.
TN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Rutherford has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

6.7
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 6.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 696 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (7.8), Rutherford has a value of 6.7 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(7.8)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.5), Rutherford has a value of 6.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (6.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.1).
Prior Value
(7.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:
83.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 83.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 83.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Rutherford has a value of 83.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Colon Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Colon Cancer Screening

66.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 66.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 66.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), Rutherford has a value of 66.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
72.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 72.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 72.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Rutherford has a value of 72.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
35.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 35.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 45.9.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 94 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 35.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (39.2), Rutherford has a value of 35.4 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(39.2)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Rutherford has a value of 35.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (35.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.5).
Prior Value
(37.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
68.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 68.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 78.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 88.2.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 68.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (69.7), Rutherford has a value of 68.6 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(69.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Rutherford has a value of 68.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (68.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (71.5).
Prior Value
(71.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:
74.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 74.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 68.9%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 74.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Rutherford has a value of 74.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

County: Rutherford Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
46.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 46.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 46.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (45.0%), Rutherford has a value of 46.0% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(45.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Rutherford has a value of 46.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (46.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (47.0%).
Prior Value
(47.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

126.4
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 126.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 103.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 121.9.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 126.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 107.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 125.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (116.1), Rutherford has a value of 126.4 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(116.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (110.5), Rutherford has a value of 126.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (126.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (126.5).
Prior Value
(126.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Health / County Health Rankings

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / County Health Rankings

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Clinical Care Ranking

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Clinical Care Ranking

19
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 19 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.

County: Rutherford Health Behaviors Ranking

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Health Behaviors Ranking

6
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.

County: Rutherford Morbidity Ranking

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Morbidity Ranking

4
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.

County: Rutherford Mortality Ranking

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Mortality Ranking

4
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.

County: Rutherford Physical Environment Ranking

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Physical Environment Ranking

63
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 63 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.

County: Rutherford Social and Economic Factors Ranking

Current Value:
3
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.

County: Rutherford

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Adults 20+ with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Adults 20+ with Diabetes

9.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 9.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.6%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 9.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.8%).
Prior Value
(10.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:
28.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 28.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.2.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 66 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (31.4), Rutherford has a value of 28.9 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(31.4)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Rutherford has a value of 28.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (28.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (28.6).
Prior Value
(28.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rutherford Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Diabetes: Medicare Population

26.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 26.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (26.0%), Rutherford has a value of 26.0%.
TN Value
(26.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Rutherford has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (26.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (27.0%).
Prior Value
(27.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
17.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 17.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 17.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (26.9%), Rutherford has a value of 17.9% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(26.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Rutherford has a value of 17.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Children with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Children with a Disability

4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (5.1%), Rutherford has a value of 4.0%.
TN Value
(5.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Rutherford has a value of 4.0%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
4.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (6.4%), Rutherford has a value of 4.6%.
TN Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Rutherford has a value of 4.6%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Persons with a Disability

11.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (15.3%), Rutherford has a value of 11.1%.
TN Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Rutherford has a value of 11.1%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
2.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (4.3%), Rutherford has a value of 2.9%.
TN Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Rutherford has a value of 2.9%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (2.9%), Rutherford has a value of 2.0%.
TN Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Rutherford has a value of 2.0%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
2.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (3.1%), Rutherford has a value of 2.1%.
TN Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Rutherford has a value of 2.1%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (8.3%), Rutherford has a value of 5.4%.
TN Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Rutherford has a value of 5.4%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Teen Birth Rate: 15-17

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Teen Birth Rate: 15-17

6.4
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-17
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 6.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (13.0), Rutherford has a value of 6.4 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(13.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (6.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.4).
Prior Value
(6.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
74.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 74.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 77.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 74.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (73.6%), Rutherford has a value of 74.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Adults with Health Insurance

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Adults with Health Insurance

87.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 87.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (86.6%), Rutherford has a value of 87.6% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(86.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.7%), Rutherford has a value of 87.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (87.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (89.9%).
Prior Value
(89.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Adults without Health Insurance

10.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 10.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 10.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Rutherford has a value of 10.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Children with Health Insurance

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Children with Health Insurance

93.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 93.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (94.7%), Rutherford has a value of 93.0% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(94.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.9%), Rutherford has a value of 93.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (93.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (95.9%).
Prior Value
(95.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Medicare Healthcare Costs

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Medicare Healthcare Costs

$9,771
Dollars per enrollee
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value ($10,071), Rutherford has a value of $9,771.
TN Value
($10,071)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value ($9,729), Rutherford has a value of $9,771.
US Value
($9,729)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford ($9,771) is greater  than the previously measured value ($9,513).
Prior Value
($9,513)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
112
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 112 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 104 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 112 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (166), Rutherford has a value of 112 which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(166)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (112) is greater and better than the previously measured value (108).
Prior Value
(108)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Persons with Health Insurance

90.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 90.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 90.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (88.1%), Rutherford has a value of 90.2% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(88.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (90.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (88.7%).
Prior Value
(88.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Rutherford Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
61.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (54.8%), Rutherford has a value of 61.8%.
TN Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Rutherford has a value of 61.8%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (61.8%) is less  than the previously measured value (65.8%).
Prior Value
(65.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
17.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (23.5%), Rutherford has a value of 17.8%.
TN Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Rutherford has a value of 17.8%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (17.8%) is greater  than the previously measured value (17.0%).
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Current Value:
3,170.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 3,170.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,890.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,301.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 3,170.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (2,841.0), Rutherford has a value of 3,170.0 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(2,841.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Rutherford has a value of 3,170.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (3,170.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (3,222.0).
Prior Value
(3,222.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Primary Care Provider Rate

43
Providers per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 43 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 24.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 90 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 43 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 30.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,995 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (71), Rutherford has a value of 43 which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(71)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (43) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (43).
Prior Value
(43)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
93.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 93.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 77.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 93.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (85.9%), Rutherford has a value of 93.1% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(85.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Rutherford has a value of 93.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

Current Value:
96.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 96.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 96.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (92.3%), Rutherford has a value of 96.8% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(92.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Rutherford has a value of 96.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
94.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 94.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 94.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (88.9%), Rutherford has a value of 94.5% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(88.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Rutherford has a value of 94.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Adults who Experienced a Stroke

2.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 2.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.3%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 2.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Rutherford has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
5.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.1%), Rutherford has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

75.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 75.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 75.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Rutherford has a value of 75.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

51.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 51.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 53.7.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 73 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (46.2), Rutherford has a value of 51.9 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(46.2)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (38.8), Rutherford has a value of 51.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (51.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (50.9).
Prior Value
(50.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
100.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 100.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 137.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 169.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 100.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 98.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 121.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (120.9), Rutherford has a value of 100.7 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(120.9)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (90.2), Rutherford has a value of 100.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (100.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (105.3).
Prior Value
(105.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (71.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Current Value:
58.3
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 58.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 128.7.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 80 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (83.1), Rutherford has a value of 58.3 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(83.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (58.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (58.9).
Prior Value
(58.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease

Current Value:
164.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 164.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 237.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 268.9.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (212.0), Rutherford has a value of 164.5 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(212.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (92.9), Rutherford has a value of 164.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(92.9 in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (164.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (174.0).
Prior Value
(174.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rutherford Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (14.0%), Rutherford has a value of 14.0%.
TN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Rutherford has a value of 14.0%.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (14.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Cholesterol Test History

85.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 85.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 85.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Rutherford has a value of 85.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (11.0%), Rutherford has a value of 11.0%.
TN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Rutherford has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:

County: Rutherford High Blood Pressure Prevalence

32.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 32.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.8%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 32.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), Rutherford has a value of 32.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

County: Rutherford High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:
34.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 34.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 34.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Rutherford has a value of 34.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
67.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 67.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 65.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 67.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (65.0%), Rutherford has a value of 67.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Rutherford has a value of 67.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (67.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (67.0%).
Prior Value
(67.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
69.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 69.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 71.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 73.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 69.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (69.0%), Rutherford has a value of 69.0%.
TN Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Rutherford has a value of 69.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (69.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (69.0%).
Prior Value
(69.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 21.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 21.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (22.0%), Rutherford has a value of 21.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Rutherford has a value of 21.0%.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (21.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (22.0%).
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Stroke: Medicare Population

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (6.0%), Rutherford has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Rutherford has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (5.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

Current Value:
16.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 16.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 60 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 16.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,449 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (18.5), Rutherford has a value of 16.2 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(18.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Rutherford has a value of 16.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (16.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.4).
Prior Value
(18.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

Current Value:
0.0
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.9.
TN Counties
(Jan 13, 2023)
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (1.2), Rutherford has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(1.2)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.7), Rutherford has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

Current Value:
8.45
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 8.45 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.80 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.28.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 8.45 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.84 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.01.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (11.69), Rutherford has a value of 8.45 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(11.69)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.97), Rutherford has a value of 8.45 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (8.45) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.34).
Prior Value
(10.34)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
52.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 52.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 46.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 42.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 52.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (51.0%), Rutherford has a value of 52.0% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(51.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Rutherford has a value of 52.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (52.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (50.0%).
Prior Value
(50.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19

Current Value:
56.4%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 56.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 44.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.8%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 56.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (56.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (56.4%).
Prior Value
(56.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (8.0%), Rutherford has a value of 8.0%.
TN Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Rutherford has a value of 8.0%.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (8.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Tuberculosis Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Tuberculosis Incidence Rate

4.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (1.9), Rutherford has a value of 4.3 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(1.9)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.8), Rutherford has a value of 4.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (4.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.9).
Prior Value
(1.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (1.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(1.4)

County: Rutherford

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Babies with Low Birthweight

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Babies with Low Birthweight

8.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 8.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 84 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (9.3%), Rutherford has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(9.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Rutherford has a value of 8.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (8.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Babies with Very Low Birthweight

Current Value:
2.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 2.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (1.6%), Rutherford has a value of 2.1% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(1.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.4%), Rutherford has a value of 2.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (2.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.5%).
Prior Value
(1.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Infant Mortality Rate

7.7
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 7.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.8.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 76 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (6.9), Rutherford has a value of 7.7 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(6.9)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.7), Rutherford has a value of 7.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (7.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.7).
Prior Value
(5.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Rutherford Preterm Births

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Preterm Births

11.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.6%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 87 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (11.3%), Rutherford has a value of 11.8% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (11.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.3%).
Prior Value
(11.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)

County: Rutherford

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:
26.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 26.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 26.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Rutherford has a value of 26.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Current Value:
14.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 14.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.7.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 49 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 14.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,307 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (17.0), Rutherford has a value of 14.6 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(17.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Rutherford has a value of 14.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (14.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.9).
Prior Value
(13.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Rutherford Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Depression: Medicare Population

18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 18.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 18.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (18.0%), Rutherford has a value of 18.0%.
TN Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Rutherford has a value of 18.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (18.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Mental Health Provider Rate

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Mental Health Provider Rate

107
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 107 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 32.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 89 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 107 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 131 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,941 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (178), Rutherford has a value of 107 which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(178)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (107) is greater and better than the previously measured value (102).
Prior Value
(102)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

18.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 18.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 18.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), Rutherford has a value of 18.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Life Expectancy

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Life Expectancy

77.2
Years
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 77.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.2.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 77.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,072 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (75.3), Rutherford has a value of 77.2 which is higher and better.
TN Value
(75.3)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (78.5), Rutherford has a value of 77.2 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (77.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (77.6).
Prior Value
(77.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

44.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 44.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 34.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 44.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Rutherford has a value of 44.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

41.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 41.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 39.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 37.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 41.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Rutherford has a value of 41.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Adults 65+ with a Disability

34.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (37.3%), Rutherford has a value of 34.2%.
TN Value
(37.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Rutherford has a value of 34.2%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
14.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (15.8%), Rutherford has a value of 14.4%.
TN Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Rutherford has a value of 14.4%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
7.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (7.7%), Rutherford has a value of 7.2%.
TN Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Rutherford has a value of 7.2%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
5.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (7.3%), Rutherford has a value of 5.3%.
TN Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Rutherford has a value of 5.3%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
13.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (14.8%), Rutherford has a value of 13.2%.
TN Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Rutherford has a value of 13.2%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease

Current Value:
42.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 42.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 52.1.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 65 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (37.7), Rutherford has a value of 42.1 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(37.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (42.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (64.6).
Prior Value
(64.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rutherford Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (7.0%), Rutherford has a value of 7.0%.
TN Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Rutherford has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
11.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.4%), Rutherford has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Adults who Visited a Dentist

59.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 59.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 53.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 59.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (64.8%), Rutherford has a value of 59.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Dentist Rate

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Dentist Rate

54
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 54 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 31 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 22.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 54 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,056 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (56), Rutherford has a value of 54 which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(56)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (54) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (54).
Prior Value
(54)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Adults with Arthritis

24.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 24.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.9%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 24.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (25.2%), Rutherford has a value of 24.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Adults with Kidney Disease

2.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 2.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 2.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Rutherford has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 21.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 21.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (19.0%), Rutherford has a value of 21.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Rutherford has a value of 21.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (21.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (22.0%).
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (10.0%), Rutherford has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Rutherford has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

36.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 36.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 36.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (37.0%), Rutherford has a value of 36.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(37.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Rutherford has a value of 36.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (36.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.0%).
Prior Value
(36.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

21.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 21.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.3%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 21.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (21.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.5%).
Prior Value
(19.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls

Current Value:
10.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 10.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 988 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (10.6), Rutherford has a value of 10.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(10.6)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.8), Rutherford has a value of 10.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (10.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.1).
Prior Value
(7.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms

Current Value:
14.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 14.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,083 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (18.5), Rutherford has a value of 14.8 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(18.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Rutherford has a value of 14.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (14.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.8).
Prior Value
(13.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

Current Value:
61.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 61.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 88.9.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 90 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 61.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 72.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (72.7), Rutherford has a value of 61.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(72.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (51.6), Rutherford has a value of 61.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (61.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (52.3).
Prior Value
(52.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)

County: Rutherford

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Adults with COPD

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Adults with COPD

6.5%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.9%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Rutherford has a value of 6.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Adults with Current Asthma

10.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 10.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.9%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 10.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Rutherford has a value of 10.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases

51.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 51.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 60.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (51.3), Rutherford has a value of 51.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(51.3)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (51.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (48.1).
Prior Value
(48.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rutherford Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Asthma: Medicare Population

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (6.0%), Rutherford has a value of 6.0%.
TN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Rutherford has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Rutherford COPD: Medicare Population

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (13.0%), Rutherford has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Rutherford has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (11.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Chlamydia Incidence Rate

579.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 579.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 316.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 429.3.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 579.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 295.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 468.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,800 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (562.4), Rutherford has a value of 579.0 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(562.4)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (495.5), Rutherford has a value of 579.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(495.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (579.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (580.2).
Prior Value
(580.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

223.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 223.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 130.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 216.6.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 223.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 97.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 199.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,117 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (269.1), Rutherford has a value of 223.5 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(269.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (214.0), Rutherford has a value of 223.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(214.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (223.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (229.6).
Prior Value
(229.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Syphilis Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Syphilis Incidence Rate

7.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 7.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.1.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (12.0), Rutherford has a value of 7.7 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.1), Rutherford has a value of 7.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.1 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (7.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.7).
Prior Value
(5.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Syphilis Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Syphilis Incidence Rate

13.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 13.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (13.6), Rutherford has a value of 13.1 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(13.6)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.2), Rutherford has a value of 13.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (13.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.9).
Prior Value
(6.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Adults who Smoke

17.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 17.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 17.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Rutherford has a value of 17.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Rutherford

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

34.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 34.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 34.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (34.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.0%).
Prior Value
(37.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)

County: Rutherford

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Insufficient Sleep

33.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 33.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 33.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (34.4%), Rutherford has a value of 33.6% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(34.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Rutherford has a value of 33.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (33.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (42.2%).
Prior Value
(42.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

County: Rutherford Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

11.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.9%), Rutherford has a value of 11.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

Current Value:
15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), Rutherford has a value of 15.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rutherford

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Voter Turnout: Presidential Election

Current Value:
73.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 73.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (69.3%), Rutherford has a value of 73.9% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (73.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (64.9%).
Prior Value
(64.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (58.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(58.4%)
<div>SDOH-07: Increase the proportion of the voting-age citizens who vote</div>

County: Rutherford

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide

Current Value:
6.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 6.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 495 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (10.0), Rutherford has a value of 6.2 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(10.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6), Rutherford has a value of 6.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (6.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.9).
Prior Value
(5.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Rutherford Violent Crime Rate

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Violent Crime Rate

405.8
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 405.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 329.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 435.8.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (617.5), Rutherford has a value of 405.8 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(617.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (405.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (355.5).
Prior Value
(355.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Average Household Size

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Average Household Size

2.80
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (2.50), Rutherford has a value of 2.80.
TN Value
(2.50)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Rutherford has a value of 2.80.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Female Population

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Female Population

50.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (50.9%), Rutherford has a value of 50.6%.
TN Value
(50.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.4%), Rutherford has a value of 50.6%.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (50.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (50.6%).
Prior Value
(50.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Foreign Born Persons

8.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (5.4%), Rutherford has a value of 8.5%.
TN Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Rutherford has a value of 8.5%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Households

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Households

122,510
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Male Population

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Male Population

49.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (49.1%), Rutherford has a value of 49.4%.
TN Value
(49.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.6%), Rutherford has a value of 49.4%.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (49.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (49.4%).
Prior Value
(49.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Population Age 5+ with Language Other than English Spoken at Home

13.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (7.6%), Rutherford has a value of 13.2%.
TN Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Rutherford has a value of 13.2%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Population American Indian and Alaska Native

Current Value:
0.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (0.5%), Rutherford has a value of 0.6%.
TN Value
(0.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Rutherford has a value of 0.6%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (0.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.6%).
Prior Value
(0.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Population Asian

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Population Asian

3.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (2.1%), Rutherford has a value of 3.9%.
TN Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.3%), Rutherford has a value of 3.9%.
US Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (3.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (3.8%).
Prior Value
(3.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Population Black or African American

Current Value:
17.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (16.7%), Rutherford has a value of 17.1%.
TN Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Rutherford has a value of 17.1%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (17.1%) is greater  than the previously measured value (17.0%).
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Population Hispanic or Latino

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Population Hispanic or Latino

10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (6.4%), Rutherford has a value of 10.0%.
TN Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.1%), Rutherford has a value of 10.0%.
US Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (10.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander

Current Value:
0.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (0.1%), Rutherford has a value of 0.1%.
TN Value
(0.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.3%), Rutherford has a value of 0.1%.
US Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (0.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.1%).
Prior Value
(0.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Population Over Age 65

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Population Over Age 65

11.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (17.3%), Rutherford has a value of 11.4%.
TN Value
(17.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.3%), Rutherford has a value of 11.4%.
US Value
(17.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (11.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (11.2%).
Prior Value
(11.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Population Over Age 65 (Count)

37,289
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Population Two or More Races

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Population Two or More Races

3.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (2.2%), Rutherford has a value of 3.1%.
TN Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.0%), Rutherford has a value of 3.1%.
US Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (3.1%) is greater  than the previously measured value (3.0%).
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Population Under Age 18

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Population Under Age 18

24.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (21.8%), Rutherford has a value of 24.2%.
TN Value
(21.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Rutherford has a value of 24.2%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (24.2%) is less  than the previously measured value (24.3%).
Prior Value
(24.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Population Under Age 5

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Population Under Age 5

6.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (5.7%), Rutherford has a value of 6.1%.
TN Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.6%), Rutherford has a value of 6.1%.
US Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (6.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.1%).
Prior Value
(6.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Population White

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Population White

75.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (78.3%), Rutherford has a value of 75.1%.
TN Value
(78.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (75.5%), Rutherford has a value of 75.1%.
US Value
(75.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (75.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (75.4%).
Prior Value
(75.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)

Current Value:
66.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (72.9%), Rutherford has a value of 66.6%.
TN Value
(72.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.9%), Rutherford has a value of 66.6%.
US Value
(58.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (66.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (67.3%).
Prior Value
(67.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Residential Segregation - Black/White

Current Value:
32.3
Score
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 32.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 45.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.7.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 73 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 32.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 49.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 61.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,083 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (66.7), Rutherford has a value of 32.3 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(66.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (63.0), Rutherford has a value of 32.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(63.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (32.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (34.2).
Prior Value
(34.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Total Population

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Total Population

360,619
People
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (360,619) is greater  than the previously measured value (351,202).
Prior Value
(351,202)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford Veteran Population

Current Value:

County: Rutherford Veteran Population

6.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (7.7%), Rutherford has a value of 6.9%.
TN Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Rutherford has a value of 6.9%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Community / Domestic Violence & Abuse

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Community / Domestic Violence & Abuse

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Domestic Violence Incidents per 1,000 Population

Current Value:
10.7
Incidents per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 10.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.4.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (8.7), Rutherford has a value of 10.7 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(8.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (10.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.3).
Prior Value
(10.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rutherford

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Rutherford Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions

11.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.2.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 52 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rutherford has a value of 11.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,266 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (16.3), Rutherford has a value of 11.3 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(16.3)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.4), Rutherford has a value of 11.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rutherford (11.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.3).
Prior Value
(12.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rutherford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)